Chapter 8, Paragraph 4, reference e: it appears that the reference to Acts 1:10 in the original manuscript is an error. Most modern versions have Acts 1:11, which seems more relevant.








Chapter 10, paragraph 1, reference a : it appears that the reference to 2 Thessalonians 3:13-14 in the original manuscript is an error. Most modern versions have 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14, which seems more relevant.







Chapter 22, paragraph 2, reference d: The reference here is incorrect. It should be John 5:23.






Chapter 26, paragraph 3, reference d: Most modern versions cite 1 Corinthians 5 rather than 1 Corinthians 15 here.






Chapter 29, paragraph 2, reference d: it appears that the reference to Acts 26:16 in the original manuscript is an error. Most modern versions have Acts 22:16 which seems more relevant.







Chapter 27, paragraph 2, reference e: it appears that the reference to Acts 12:29,30 in the original manuscript is an error (Acts 12:29,30 do not exists). Most modern versions cite Acts 11:29,30.






Chapter 32, paragraph 3, reference i: it appears that the reference to Luke 13:35,36 in the original manuscript is an error (Luke 13:36 does not exist). Most modern versions have Luke 12:35-40.






Many today who hold firmly to the 1677/89 Confession cannot agree with this dogmatic identification of the Pope of Rome as the antichrist of 2 Thessalonians 2:2-9.









Dr James M. Renihan
Institute of Reformed Baptist Studies
P.O. Box 300771
Escondido, CA 92030-0771
USA